Simple and Comprehensive with a Side of Historical Exemption
Bill Whittle has offered up a recipe for ensuring the success of the people’s message, one that can be well applied to every new legislative shackle that BO and his traitorous horde try to clamp on us between now and January 2011:
So, to the short term: everybody knows that Reid and Pelosi and The Lightworker himself, obviously, are all hoping to use this bill as the foot in the door for the stuff they really want: A single-payer National Health System, or at least the “public option,” which is simply single-payer on the installment plan. We can’t let them get that. Going forward, we can’t let them get single-payer, or cap and trade, or amnesty, or any of it.
We can learn some lessons here. We have to. One lesson is message discipline. What is message discipline? I’ll give you an example:
What’s in a Big Mac? Two all beef patties, special sauce, lettuce, cheese, pickles, onions on a sesame seed bun! That’s what’s in a big mac. We have got to understand that saying NO! to this socialism is admirable and essential, but that from now on there has to be a counter-narrative to what these Marxists are selling, because like it or not the human brain is wired for stories — that’s how we learn (and why the real fight is not for Washington but rather Hollywood — but that’s a story for another time.)
If we want to win on health care, or any other issue, we need to have an answer to what they are selling and that answer needs to be as simple and comprehensive as the Big Mac slogan.
Our position on health care? Two tax incentives, health accounts, crossing state lines, tort reform, competition on an auto insurance bun. And if we don’t learn how to do this we will lose.
Whittle’s final thought is a fine one for those of us who are still working through and toward being what he calls a “nation of steely-eyed missile men” (and women). Some inspiration to achieve our steely resolve and focused eye on the prize:
A final thought on this darkish day: much is said about the “inevitability” of these kinds of legislation, that once enacted they are impossible to repeal or roll back.
This kind of thinking is self-fulfilling defeatism and has to stop. ANY law enacted can be repealed. We repealed a constitutional amendment, for God’s sake. From now on we must change our message from one of limiting goverment growth and spending and regulation to one of reducing it.
It is true that no nation has in the past ever recovered from the cycle of entitlement, moral decay and aristocratic rot that we find ourselves in. But it is also true that no nation — not one in history — was established precisely in opposition to these cancers. It is also true that never before have common people– otherwise known as the Host Organism — had the means to speak directly to one another, as we are here. It is true that if there is to be an historical exemption to the Cycle of Civilization it is only here that it will occur, and it is also true that the concepts of Free Will and Destiny are antithetical to one another. One of them is true and the other is not. It is my belief that you can chose to abandon Free Will and chose to believe in destiny and historical inevitablity, or you can take the risk to believe instead that there is a new world populated by optimists and dreamers, but dreamers with rifles as well as quills and parchment… People who have never surrendered and for whom the very idea of defeat and dispair is anathema.
That’s a choice I make every day. What we see before us is the result of lost elections and redemption will come from winning elections. Mark these words, my friends: We are going to whip these Marxists out of their little commie boots!
Hear, hear!


Jill 5:20 PM on 03/22/2010 Permalink |
Hold the pickle. I mean, that was great!
backyardconservative 5:28 PM on 03/22/2010 Permalink |
Yes. Very helpful. I used that auto insurance analogy in my dialogue in front of schakowsky’s office.
I won’t mention pickles, but when I asked this couple if they thought we should be forced under ObamaCare to pay for sex-change operations they were not pleased at the one-sized fits all expensive approach. But look!:
http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:CHR52PP-ZycJ:blog.heritage.org/2009/07/28/sex-change-you-can-believe-in/+states+mandate+payment+for+sex-change+operations&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-a
We all know ObamaCare will lead to rationing but it will most likely be seniors and un PC “diseases” that get short shrift.
backyardconservative 5:29 PM on 03/22/2010 Permalink |
Actually the ” ” should be around sex-change as a “disease”
backyardconservative 5:32 PM on 03/22/2010 Permalink |
If someone wants that, fine, but it just underscores the need for a private market. No pun intended.
And I guess we can debate whether it is an optional surgery or not. That is for another day. But think about this micro level of resentment people are going to feel when the feel like ObamaCare is a zero-sum game.
backyardconservative 7:26 PM on 03/22/2010 Permalink |
And of course we know driving/buying a car is an option. The constitutionality of mandating health insurance is the question the states are raising, among others.
fuzislippers 12:48 AM on 03/23/2010 Permalink |
Not only can you choose not to buy a car, but you aren’t buying a policy for the whole country’s driving record. If YOU have a good record, you don’t have to buy a policy for a drunk driver. The healthcare mandate over reaches and is not at all comparable.
You don’t have the IRS taking money from your bank account if you don’t buy car insurance or buy the insurance the government tells you that you must have to cover everyone else’s poor driving!
fuzislippers 12:39 AM on 03/23/2010 Permalink |
Yes, this is one of many things we will now be paying for. There’s a good list at Sharp Right Turn that includes some of the things everyone pays for: http://sharprightturn.wordpress.com/2010/03/22/ibd-20-ways-obamacare-will-take-away-our-freedom/
Sex changes, drug and alcohol rehab, you name it. Whatever, whenever. And we are being forced to buy this, not for ourselves, but for other people. I can’t see how that’s constitutional. If this is upheld, what’s to stop the government forcing us to buy everyone a house or a car or a computer. It’s ridiculous and deeply un-American in every conceivable way.
fuzislippers 12:39 AM on 03/23/2010 Permalink |
Heh, I thought you’d like the “potluck” title ;)
Quite Rightly 5:33 PM on 03/22/2010 Permalink |
This is good. Whittle is on the right track. We are tired (very tired) of being the host organism, and if we have to start splashing a little antiseptic around, well, pass me the bucket. We come from honorable bloodlines of people who refused–seriously refused–to surrender to tyranny, and, contrary to popular belief among Progs, we are not the “mouth-breathing illiterates (McArdle) that we are made out to be. We need more than a “mission statement” answer to the Dems attacks, though. George Patton, who, despite his unpopularity, led troops with low casualty rates (relatively speaking) had this to say about defense:
In war the only sure defense is offense, and the efficiency of the offense depends on the warlike souls of those conducting it.
Carol 7:54 PM on 03/22/2010 Permalink |
Well said. I’m ready to go on offense. In my district the current Rep., Kathy Castor (D), is considered “safe.” We have a great candidate in Mike Prendergast and I am ready to focus my energy on getting Castor out of that safe seat and putting in a Conservative. The next battle is for Congress. I say we go for it.
Quite Rightly 8:44 PM on 03/22/2010 Permalink |
I agree: the next battle is for Congress. We have got to get rid of the Red Queen.
I think we need to get rid of the 17th amendment, too, so that Senators report to their respective states, and not the President. I can think of about 38 states that might find that idea at least somewhat appealing right now.
Quite Rightly 8:52 PM on 03/22/2010 Permalink |
Oh, yeah, and we need a slew of the right kind of Republican governors, too, like Fuzzy pointed out below.
fuzislippers 12:45 AM on 03/23/2010 Permalink |
I really think this is vital to our offensive line. Changing Congress is an absolutely necessary defensive measure, but ensuring that we have a sufficient number of governors in place to amend the constitution is our best line of offense should this administration keep pushing its insane agenda AND if ObamaCare individual mandates are not struck down as unconstitutional. I’m okay with changing the constitution to protect individual citizens from being forced to buy anything at all.
fuzislippers 12:55 AM on 03/23/2010 Permalink |
Agreed, Carol. We can do this, and as Conservative Generation reminds us at Left Coast Rebel, there IS precedent for the people’s victory. http://www.leftcoastrebel.com/2010/03/history-tells-us-that-yes-we-can-repeal.html
C Gen 11:27 AM on 03/24/2010 Permalink |
Thanks for the link Fuzzy!
ObamaCare, the Day After link-a-round « The Daley Gator 7:05 PM on 03/22/2010 Permalink |
[...] for the elites while Jill reminds us that the Democrats are not sated yet. The ladies at Potluck, are spoiling for a fight, as is [...]
nicedeb 10:56 PM on 03/22/2010 Permalink |
I love Bill Whittle, but how un-pc of him to use the terms Marxists and Socialists to describe these Dems. What would Bernard Goldberg say?
(That’s in reference to Goldberg’s appearance on the O’Reilly Factor, tonight.)
fuzislippers 12:51 AM on 03/23/2010 Permalink |
I quit watching the O’Reilly Factor, but I can just imagine.
CA Rep Introducing New Legislation to add “Robust Public Option” « Nice Deb 8:58 AM on 03/23/2010 Permalink |
[...] tip: fuzislippers at Potluck. Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Obama/Reid/Pelosi’s Dastardly Plan To Pass [...]