Tagged: foreign affairs Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • backyardconservative 2:14 PM on 04/29/2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , foreign affairs,   

    American-Brit Special Relationship: PMQs & Sex in the City 

    Exports and imports. The final British debate is today and you can watch it on C-Span shortly. Toby Harnden, The Telegraph sets the stage.

    And this tidbit from Reuters:

    Sales of sultry lingerie among older women are booming in Britain thanks to the glamorous 40-somethings of “Sex and the City 2” and “Cougar Town,” retail chain Debenhams reported on Thursday.

    Who says our special relationship is dead?

  • Quite Rightly 11:09 AM on 04/12/2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: foreign affairs   

    Lech Kaczynski: Ask Not For Whom The Bell Tolls 

    It is not a surprise that leftists detested Lech Kaczynski.

    Although Poland joined the European Union, Kaczynski was a Eurosceptic, because he believed more strongly in Polish independence than in following mandates from the European Union.

    During the Russia-Georgia War, when Russia planned to annex two provinces of Georgia, Kaczynski strongly denounced Russia. He called the confrontation between Georgia and Russia a “test of strength” in which “Russia showed the face it wanted to show–an imperial face.”

    Kaczynski saw Russia as “just the old Russia,” not the “reset” Russia imagined by Obama. Unlike Obama, Kacznyski knew Russia, his country’s next door neighbor and former brutal occupier, very well. He was a proponent of building alternative routes for oil and natural gas from Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, and Kazakhstan to bypass Russia and thus break Russia’s stranglehold on European energy supplies. “We have to convince Russia,” he said, “that the imperial era is over. . . . Those who were then appeasing Hitler were firmly convinced that they were right. Time showed something different.”

    He backed plans with the U.S. under George W. Bush to deploy 10 interceptor missiles on Polish territory, a plan which Russia hated. From Kaczynski’s perspective, those missiles “would deepen the interest of the United States” in Poland. Obama later countermanded that agreement, in line with his usual treatment of American allies, like the UK, Israel, and India.

    Even more annoying to leftists is Poland’s own energy independence; while much of Europe depends on Russian pipeline gas, Poland draws on “its own plentiful domestic gas and enormous oil reserves.” There “is even talk of Poland becoming a gas exporter to its Central European and Baltic northern neighbors.” According to David Howell, former British Cabinet minister:

    This in turn reinforces the opportunities for the whole of Europe to become increasingly self-sufficient in low-cost energy, and therefore far less reliant not only on Russia’s arrogant gas monopoly, Gazprom, but also on the smoldering Middle East and other shaky and worrying sources of oil and gas round the world. Moscow’s gas czars would then have to sell their gas eastward to China, Japan and other Asian customers for the best price they could secure.

    To bring the necessary physical infrastructure into existence, of course, “would require EU leaders and officials to work for much simpler regulations and licensing procedures and much lighter taxation.”

    Simpler regulations and lighter taxation do not sound like the socialism I know. In contrast, Poland’s fiscal policies enabled it to sidestep the current recession.

    In terms of religious belief, Kaczynski was a double-edged thorn in the side of leftist politics. He stood up for his religious faith, and was a founder of Poland’s conservative Catholic Law and Justice party, which was no friend to abortion or gay marriage. And, as William Jacobson pointed out, “Kaczynski also was a great friend of Israel and the Jewish people, as described in the Jerusalem Post.” Jacobson’s view:

    A man who loved the United States, freedom for the individual, and the Jewish people. There are far too few such people in the world, and we just lost one of the best of them.

    James Corum, posting at the UK Telegraph agreed. “The death of President Lech Kaczynski and many Polish national leaders yesterday,” he said, “is not only Poland’s loss — it’s also a loss for the Western democratic world.”

    I will add that it is a particular loss for the world to lose a political leader who knows whereof he speaks.

    Kaczynski didn’t pick up his political views from ideological textbooks painting rosy pictures of an idyllic world “unfettered” by responsibility, religion, and ambitious pursuit of happiness, but in a torturous cookpot of repression, anti-religion, and communal poverty–for those lucky enough to live through the experience.

    And he came out of it with his moral compass intact.

    Lech Kaczynski was the stalwart antithesis of the leftist ideal, and we have great need of such men. So, it is with profound sorrow that I ask not for whom the bell tolls . . . .

    More at Bread upon the Waters.

    • fuzislippers 1:02 PM on 04/12/2010 Permalink | Reply

      What a fantastic post. I agree that Kaczynski stood for everything the left hates: individual responsibility, love of country (as opposed to the we’re all “one world” fantastical crap spewed by the unrealistic left, though to be fair, I think that more than a few of our fellow Americans who dream that impossible dream are seeing what’s going on with Iran and beginning to understand that the one big happy world dream is just that–you can’t have a big happy “one world” if some countries refuse to play nicely with others.), self-reliance, and freedom. Gee, he was a lot like those of us fighting for these very things at home. No wonder BO stabbed the Poles in the back; he has to hate them as much as he hates us (and Israel, and the UK).

      • Quite Rightly 8:05 PM on 04/12/2010 Permalink | Reply

        Thanks for the kind words.

        And glad to see that you are up and about.

        Yes, he must hate them as much as he hates us. Personally, I suspect that Obama has a difficult time in encounters with men of genuine courage and character. Such men must radiate some kind of energy (measured honesty, perhaps) that makes Obama look small in his own eyes. Obama then responds with some petulant payback, like stomping out on Netanyahu or sending the Dalai Lama out with the trash. He has the opposite reaction to men who wouldn’t recognize a civil right if it bit them on the ankle. There he seems to have a default reflex to bow and scrape. Strange.

        • backyardconservative 9:53 PM on 04/12/2010 Permalink | Reply

          Very good stuff, thanks. Great info and insight. I had no idea Poland had such significant energy reserves–I just knew about their coal.

          And you have Obama pegged. Petulant–that’s good.

        • fuzislippers 1:00 PM on 04/13/2010 Permalink | Reply

          I think that you are on to something here, QR. He does seem to shrink in the face of good men, men of, as you say, genuine courage and character. Perhaps that shrinkage (heh) does register with him in some way–breaks through that narcissistic shell and shows him to himself as what he is, a tiny little man with no character, no morals, no sense of right and wrong. I’d feel sorry for him if he weren’t so truly loathsome.

Compose new post
Next post/Next comment
Previous post/Previous comment
Show/Hide comments
Go to top
Go to login
Show/Hide help
shift + esc