Tagged: limbaugh Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • just a conservative girl 11:57 AM on 08/10/2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , limbaugh,   

    Hey President Obama is Right – She Didn’t Build That 

    So Sandra Fluke appeared with the President of the United States a few days ago to talk about “free” contraception and keeping the government out of our bedrooms. I will forgo the whole paradox of keeping the government out of your bedroom while the government now demands that I fund what goes on your bedroom for a minute. I was kind of hoping that they would go back to the You didn’t build that theme, because Fluke certainly didn’t earn her appearance with POTUS. Rush Limbaugh did. A case where the president is indeed correct, she didn’t build that.  Someone else made that happen.

    And before liberals start in, I did speak out about Rush calling her a slut.

    • A.Men 12:41 PM on 08/10/2012 Permalink | Reply

      She didn’t build that. I heard Fluck never has had sex, a friend called me and told me. Let her prove she does — to get her free birth control that other American taxpayers will have to pay for.

    • NotAScientist 1:26 PM on 08/10/2012 Permalink | Reply

      Why so much anger about letting women have birth control?

      • just a conservative girl 3:10 PM on 08/10/2012 Permalink | Reply

        She can take birth control all the live long day for all I care. This isn’t about birth control, it is about her trying to force a church that doesn’t believe in it to pay for it. It never was about birth control, it is about about religious freedom.

        • NotAScientist 3:34 PM on 08/10/2012 Permalink | Reply

          No…it’s about organizations that happened to be owned by Churches having insurance that covers birth control. Lets not get into how biblical church-owned businesses are…

    • just a conservative girl 3:40 PM on 08/10/2012 Permalink | Reply

      Do they have a non profit status and operate under those rules? Georgetown University is a school that is run by the Catholic Church. It isn’t a business. You can disagree with the stance, that isn’t the issue. The issue is that they have the right to their belief and to their conscience. Your agreement isn’t relevant., but the constitutional implications are.

  • just a conservative girl 10:47 AM on 08/02/2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , limbaugh, ,   

    Quote of the Day – Rush Limbaugh Edition Part 6 

    And we all know that that campaign would have had zilch, zero, nada energy and wouldn’t have had anywhere near the chance it had were it not for Palin.  No question about it.  The mistake on that ticket was not Palin.  Pure and simple.  Sarah Palin was not the mistake on that ticket.

    Rush Limbaugh talking about Vice President Cheney’s assessment that Gov. Palin was a mistake for the VP nod in 2008

    • SignPainterGuy 12:05 PM on 08/02/2012 Permalink | Reply

      In `08, I voted for Sarah; John came with the ticket. John McLame was the mistake !

      In all the blogs I`ve read and their comments, anecdotally speaking of course, the vast majority have stated they did not want McCain, or at least they wanted him to get tough on Obama. We felt the establishment Republican Party crammed him down our throats and cost us the election, though I will say this; had Obama NOT won, the nation would still be asleep and we would still be on this trajectory over the cliff, maybe just not as far along ! Yes, I`m saying Obama`s win was a kind of blessing for us, a wake up call, a slap in the face from the cold, wet dishrag of reality !

    • Ednar 8:54 PM on 08/02/2012 Permalink | Reply

      I didnt want John McCain. The Democrats handed John McCain to us whether we wanted him or not!
      They voted out of their political bases to boost him up during the primaries! I recall, then, Huckabee & McCain ganged up on Romney.
      But b/c he was the sole republican to run against Obama … had NO choice but to back him up!
      Obama deliberately BLOCKED all negative comments on all his videos, including mine.
      McCain? Had the decency to allow all vitriol from the left! Tried to sustain & hold off as much of the vehement attacks as possible & was partially successful.

    • Don 11:04 PM on 08/02/2012 Permalink | Reply

      My fervent hope is that Ednar is right and the Conservatives in this country have woken enough to bitch slap the GOP establishment into doing the right things.

      • SignPainterGuy 11:45 AM on 08/03/2012 Permalink | Reply

        Heh, you have this way with words ! :-) AND I agree !

  • just a conservative girl 3:08 PM on 07/18/2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , dark knight, , limbaugh,   

    The Context of Rush’s Statement that the Media Won’t Report 

    “It has been observed that movies can reflect the national mood,” said Democratic advisor and former Clinton aide Christopher Lehane. “Whether it is spelled Bain and being put out by the Obama campaign or Bane and being out by Hollywood, the narratives are similar: a highly intelligent villain with offshore interests and a past both are seeking to cover up who had a powerful father and is set on pillaging society,” he added.

    This comment was reported a full day before Rush made his comments on Bane, the bad guy in the upcoming Batman movie.  Of course the people on the left that are reporting this are leaving out this detail as well as taking Rush’s comment out of context.  He outright says that there are people out there who are not very well-informed will make the connection when the hear name Bain Capitol.  And let’s be honest here, there are many stupid people out there; sad but true.

    Obviously I have not seen the new movie as it has not been released yet.  But I did see Dark Knight, and that was a story of good versus evil.  It attempted to make people to think about what you would do if you pushed to your limits and beyond by forces that are evil.  Would you go for revenge or would you do the Christian thing and forgive?  Not that it put it in a Christian context as such in the movie, but the premise remains the same.  This movie has been talked about as an extension of those themes.

    Rush was responding to these comments as well as to liberal bloggers who made the connection.  The movie was written well before Romney was the nominee and Bane was a past character being brought back.  So there was never any connection intended.  But that didn’t stop the left from saying so.  But all of a sudden Rush is a paranoid idiot when he discussed the left making the comparison.

    Media bias much?  Hypocrisy is thy name.

  • just a conservative girl 2:20 PM on 06/28/2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: limbaugh,   

    Quote of the Day – Rush Limbaugh Edition Part 5 

    Boiling tea only makes it stronger

    Rush Limbaugh

  • just a conservative girl 11:39 AM on 03/05/2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , limbaugh, religious protections   

    Rush Changing the Narrative 

    There are many on the right who are very unhappy, to say the least, about Rush Limbaugh issuing an apology for calling Sandra Fluke a slut.  They shouldn’t be.  The anger should be directed at him using the word in the place.  Above and beyond how derogatory the word is towards women, it changed the conversation; and not in a good way.

    I understand what Rush was trying to do.  He was pointing out the irony of her claim.  But the truth is we know nothing about this woman’s sex life.  If you are thinking to yourself that you do, then when is the last time she performed a sexual act?  How many partners has she had in the past six months?  Is she heterosexual or homosexual?  Chances are you know none of the answers to these questions because she never discussed her sex life and what type of birth control (if any) that she uses.  She discusses the topic in a more generic conversation and talked about countless “others” who tell her their stories of woe.

    What Rush and everyone else needs to be concentrating on is the first amendment.  The government trying to dictate to a church what is and what isn’t protected by the constitution, not her sex life.  Seriously, are you all that interested in her sex life?  I am not.  I could care less what she does in her bedroom. As long as it done by consenting adults, it is none of my concern.  What is my concern is how she is trying to push her will and her view-point onto the Catholic Church and Georgetown University.  She chose that school for a reason.  She went there specifically to try to force them to change their policy on birth control.  She did this before Obamacare and the mandates were even an issue.  She has been working on this for almost three years.

    Look, birth control isn’t the issue.  I have used birth control in my life and I can guarantee you no one will be accusing me of being a slut.  Newsflash; not all conservative women are virgins when the get married and therefore use birth control.  Newsflash;, not all conservative women are looking to have large families; so they use birth control.  The issue is does the federal government have the right to force a religious institution to go against the doctrines and teachings of the church that has been around for thousands of years?  These church teachings have been in existence long before the U.S. was ever formed.

    The left set the trap and we conservatives walked right into it.  This isn’t about sex, it isn’t about birth control, it is about liberty.  We need to do ourselves a favor and stop talking about this woman’s sex life and deal with the fact that she is trying to push her will onto the rest of the country; regardless of the constitutional protections that are in place.  We need to stop playing their game.  They wanted to paint conservatives as a bunch of people who think anyone who uses birth control is some sort of sexual deviant who needs us to tell them how to live their lives and what drugs they can and cannot put into their bodies.  That is a battle we cannot, should not  and will not win.  Americans don’t want the right telling them how to live their lives anymore than they want left doing it.  What Americans want is their freedoms and liberties to be protected.  Our job is to tell them that they are being ebbed away by an over-reaching, ever more powerful federal government in the guise of discussion on birth control.  If we keep the discussion on birth control and Ms. Fluke’s sex life they don’t see that they are giving away their liberties willingly in exchange for a $9 pack of generic birth control pills.

    • fuzislippers 11:44 AM on 03/05/2012 Permalink | Reply

      Actually, if I’m angry at Rush for anything (and I’m not), it would be his being too stupid to leave the leftist trap alone. Instead of seeing what they were doing, he just charged in like an idiot and did what too many others are happy to do–and the left is in pure ecstasy about–talk about birth control, sex, and abortion.

      We were winning this battle on the Constitution, on the free exercise of religion, on the huge problem with government dictating to religious organizations, mandating that they go against their conscience.

      Let that sink in. We were winning that battle. Handily.

      Enter all the crazies talking about birth control, then the set up with Fluke, then Rush leaping into the trap. Now where are we? Where is religious freedom? Losing. Big.

      This is not, never was, and never will be about contraception–let’s stop playing into the left’s hands. The issue is freedom. Period. No ifs, no ands, and damn sure, no butts.

      • DemocratGuy 1:59 PM on 03/06/2012 Permalink | Reply

        Visitor from ObamaLand here, hope you don’t mind! I think Fuzi’s point was right, that the whole issue was a set-up–it just seems too perfectly timed with Santorum’s rise in the polls. Obama is definitely not above wedge-issue politics, hopey changey stuff notwithstanding.

        But, I want to press you, Fuzi, on one point. Is it really true that you’re not angry at the attitude Rush put on display? All the stuff about aspirins between the knees, I mean, that’s so unbelievably demeaning to a whole group of women at a religious institution. I’m not talking about the language or the words, but the sentiment. And then the idea that men should be compensated with sex videos? I mean, what sick mind would think of that in the first place, let alone believe that was funny, hilarious, absurd, ridiculous, or anything else but just sick? Isn’t it horribly offensive, no matter your stance on the policy question?

        • just a conservative girl 5:41 PM on 03/06/2012 Permalink | Reply

          I can’t speak for Fuzzi, but that is part of Rush’s shtick. The videos was about the notion that somehow she has a right to birth control. If I and every other tax payer now must pay for birth control then we should be getting something out of it. And yes, all of us will be paying for birth control whether we use or not, whether we agree with it or not. There is no such thing as birth control fairies that will be giving that out for free; regardless of President Obama says. The people who listen to him on a regular basis don’t look at it as demeaning. We just don’t. We think it is demeaning that we are being asked to pay for it.

          • DemocratGuy 10:40 AM on 03/07/2012 Permalink | Reply

            Thanks for letting my comment through moderation. And thanks, JACG, for your thoughtful reply! I realize it wasn’t fair of me to ask Fuzi (or you) to set aside the policy question, given its importance to you as a constitutional issue. In any case, I appreciate the time you’ve taken to answer my question. Great blog!

            • just a conservative girl 4:27 PM on 03/07/2012 Permalink | Reply

              You welcome back anytime since you seem to be willing to engage in real debate minus the name calling and rhetoric. You should now no longer go into moderation. Keep it civil and you won’t be deleted. We welcome all points of view.

        • fuzislippers 10:59 AM on 03/07/2012 Permalink | Reply

          Sorry, DemocratGuy, I only just saw this notification when your second one came through.

          Anyway, to address your delightfully civil comments/questions: heck, no, I’m not angry at Rush’s attitude or what he said. I’m a conservative. If I got upset every time some leftist “comedian,” pundit, talk show host, politician, or random troll called a woman a name (“slut” is actually one of the nicer terms I’ve heard from leftists), my head would have exploded in self-righteous indignation ages ago.

          I’m not in the least upset that a conservative stooped to that level, at least not beyond the obvious fact that it was beneath him (and as JACG points out, he’s a shock jock, it’s what he does—isn’t that Bill Maher’s excuse for calling Sarah Palin a “cunt” and David Letterman making jokes about Bristol Palin’s sex life?).

          Are you honestly upset that Limbaugh “demeaned” a “whole group of women” or are you upset that a CONSERVATIVE used the same tactics and language that leftists use against women on a daily basis? Something to think about. Now I don’t know you, and you seem nice enough, so maybe you do get outraged at all of the horrible things that are said about conservative women (the rape fantasies and death wishes are always fun). Maybe you do . . . . or maybe that’s “different”? Somehow.

          I think that one thing that might bridge the ideological gap is the following consideration of my conservative principles. Name calling is not nice, it’s rude, it’s ill-mannered. It’s not, however, anything more than that (which is why conservatives always graciously accept the (forced) apologies when they are made, which is all-too-rarely).

          If he thinks she’s a slut, so what? Is that really an indictment of everyone with a vagina? Of course not, but I used to be a leftist, so I get the whole group think thing and know that’s both an extension of the collectivist craziness that is the entire Marxist miindset and the knee-jerk reaction to any conservative daring to have a viewpoint. Tolerance, really, isn’t a strong suit on the left. Nor is forgiveness. But I guess that’s why it’s so hard for you to understand that I’m not in the least bit upset that Rush called Fluke a slut. It’s still a (relatively) free country.

          You’ll notice that I’m not talking about contraception because that is not what this is about (never was, never will be).

          • fuzislippers 11:18 AM on 03/07/2012 Permalink | Reply

            Oops, correction: I was never a leftist, but I was a liberal (or thought I was).

            • DemocratGuy 1:41 PM on 03/07/2012 Permalink | Reply

              Hi there, Fuzi! Since you asked, for the record, yes, I do get very annoyed and upset when conservative women are attacked this way, and I was thinking of the vicious, vile insults hurled at Sarah Palin by the likes of snide jerks like Bill Maher. I was also thinking about how frustrating it was to hear so few on “my side” speak out against such slime. In fact, I specifically clicked over to Potluck just to see how you folks dealt with a similar situation.

              Thanks to you, too, for the reply. Always great to get your perspective on things, and I appreciate you taking the time to listen to me natter on. –Mike

            • DemocratGuy 1:42 PM on 03/07/2012 Permalink | Reply

              Oh, and I should have said I laughed out loud re: the “my head would have exploded ages ago” comment. RIGHT ON!

    • A.Men 12:03 PM on 03/05/2012 Permalink | Reply

      Rush Limbaugh was 100% right about Fluck. Wake up!

      • just a conservative girl 12:09 PM on 03/05/2012 Permalink | Reply

        I think you need to wake up. Why are we talking about this women’s sex life instead of religious liberties then? We talk about her sex life it allows the left to cover up what they are trying to do. They then win.

    • SignPainterGuy 12:25 PM on 03/05/2012 Permalink | Reply

      Rush opened today`s show with an apology to us and acknowledgement that he`d sunk to the left`s level in using the word “slut”.

      Preach it, Fuzi ! ;-)

      • Sherry 9:09 AM on 03/10/2012 Permalink | Reply

        I struggle still, because Fluke 1) lied before Congress 2) knew she was lying and 3) if she was lying about something as basic as her age to make herself more sympathetic, what else was she possibly lying about?

        Yes there are people who need birth control for medical reasons, not social ones, just as there are men who need viagra for reasons other than pure pleasure. But you’re right, Rush derailed the dialogue with the distraction and as a result, she’s been elevated to the point that the media and left and even now the cowed right, won’t vet her testimony.

        We cannot know if any of the sob stories she told were true. She used her platform to pour out a story that demands people violate thier faith so she can act as she will, be it slutty or chaste. And now with Rush, many more people heard her testimony, and she has become a martyr for the left. She may not be what Rush called her, but she is something else, though perhaps only in such small things as one’s age by seven years, untruthful.

        • just a conservative girl 11:26 AM on 03/10/2012 Permalink | Reply

          Did she lie about her age or did the media assume that she was 23? I don’t think she said her age. The media ran with it. I agree she lied, but I don’t think it was about her age. I will have to listen again to find out. What she lied about was the costs of birth control in the DC area. I live here I know that birth control is dispensed like Pez here.

        • just a conservative girl 7:32 AM on 03/11/2012 Permalink | Reply

          She didn’t lie about her age. In her testimony she said she was a third year law student, but never told her age. She also said that she was an activist and named the organization she was ahead of. here is the link. Much of the media coverage of her testimony is not correct. Wow, what a shock that is. http://current.com/1mhv4kc

  • just a conservative girl 5:10 PM on 02/24/2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: limbaugh,   

    Quote of the Day – Rush Limbaugh Edition Part 4 

    ‎”Most people don’t get up every day, face the direction of Washington, and bow down and pray. Government is not first and foremost in people’s lives. That’s not how Americans are wired. But Obama wants us to be.”

    Rush Limbaugh

  • just a conservative girl 9:41 PM on 01/10/2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: limbaugh, ,   

    Quote of the Day – Rush Limbaugh Edition Part 3 

    “Newt is trying to dredge up long-lasting negatives and have them attach to Romney (this is what’s so unsettling about this) in the same way the left would. You could, after all these Newt bites, say, ‘I’m Barack Obama, and I approve this message’.”

    Rush on Newt’s attack on capitalism.

    And my quote to Newt is the STFU.


  • just a conservative girl 7:37 PM on 12/19/2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , boxer, limbaugh,   

    Quote of the Day – Rush Limbaugh Edition Part 2 

    Now, I bring this up ’cause most people look at this, and I do, too, you know, I laugh at it.  Hey, Ms. Boxer, how many people have you killed with your abortion legislation?  How many people have you killed with your stand on abortion since 1973?  How many people, have been deaths, Barbara Boxer, are you personally responsible for? And to sit around here and talk about pollution killing 8,100 people, that Republicans want to kill people.  Now, the reason this is important is not for the obvious reason.  These are the kind of people, we’re told, that independent voters will skedaddle to and support if our Republican candidates dare get too critical of Barack Obama.

    Rush Limbaugh on Barbara Boxer’s statement that republicans want to poison people.

  • just a conservative girl 4:14 PM on 10/31/2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , limbaugh,   

    Quote of the Day – Rush Limbaugh Edition 

    ‎”This smear of Herman Cain is about blacks and Hispanics getting too ‘uppity’ for liberals. That’s what this is. It’s Democrats saying, ‘You don’t achieve in American politics as a Republican, as a self-reliant individual or conservative. You don’t do it. You try it and we’re going to destroy you!’

    Rush on the reports that Herman Cain has sexually harassed women in the past.

    • SignPainterGuy 6:32 PM on 10/31/2011 Permalink | Reply

      But, but, liberals / progressives / dhimmicrats are the ones that claim to be “for” the blacks and Hispanics ! I`ve heard that for decades. They wouldn`t be lying would they ?

    • Macross 9:45 PM on 10/31/2011 Permalink | Reply

      Yes, and lets conveniently forget the fact that Washington is now abuzz with the news of Perry’s hand in the story.

      Lets also ignore the fact that the Democrats would’ve gained more if they released information such as this during the presidential election itself, instead during the Republican primaries which would only benefit people like Romney, Perry, Bachmann, Santorum et al.

      Let’s once again ignore the fact that even Cain himself acknowledged the truth of the Politico story.

      Lets, one more time, ignore the fact that most of you have not displayed any interest to find out if the allegations had any truth in them.

      And finally, lets ignore the fact that Limbaugh’s comment smacks of hypocrisy, considering the smearing the lot of you have done on Obama. Especially since there are documented evidence behind Politico’s claim, while almost all of the Obama character smears are based on nothing more than ‘sources’, fudged up facts and outright fabrications.

      You just gotta love the hypocrisy of the God-fearing right. lol.

      • just a conservative girl 11:10 PM on 10/31/2011 Permalink | Reply

        Hmm., apparently you didn’t read the below post where I asked the question if this was done by the right. I agree with you, their are people on the right that have more to gain then the left at this point. Since this did happen by his own admission it isn’t a smear job. This is information that should have come out and the earlier the better. You also must have missed my post about the case against Cain being the nominee.

      • SignPainterGuy 11:09 PM on 11/01/2011 Permalink | Reply

        Macross, You got nuthin`. Politico has not been able to produce the two accusers, who BTW, were paid only a few months salary to shut up and disappear. Must not have been much to the accusation for that pittance, plus, as you either “forgot” or just didn`t bother with noticing, the accusations were found to be baseless.

        EVERYTHING I`ve ever said about Oblamer is true. He`s a marxist socialist liar and most likely muslim. Prove me wrong !

        Nope, you got nuthin` !

    • Macross 12:11 AM on 11/02/2011 Permalink | Reply

      I just read your previous blog, Conservative Girl. Good on you.

      Sign Painter Guy, for the record, Politico has spoken to the two women, has copies of the agreement, has testimonials from a few people involved in the matter. They approached the Cain campaign thirteen days ago, asking for comment, but they kept quiet for 5 days, while putting out feelers to know how much Politico really know.

      Matters turned to a joke from then on, as Gordon sent an e-mail denying the accusations, retracted it twelve hours later, followed by an amended mail, and then stayed silent again. A Politico staff questioned Cain in front of other reporters 4/5 days ago, and he fudged his answers. Finally, after a whole lotta fudging, he came clean three days ago, admitting that there was a lawsuit and denying any knowledge of the settlement. Two days ago, he changed his story and confirmed that he knew of the settlement, but did not know of the numbers involved. Now, those are the facts – a favor for you to stop you from making anymore silly comments.

      Next: When you make an accusation, the onus is on you to provide the proof. Get it? So can you prove your accusations? Of course not. You’re just a regular sheeple.

      Once again, for the record, both of your accusations about Obama above is based on a short book written by an individual under the regular employment of a notable right wing group, distributed several months before Obama’s inauguration. The book made a lot of fanciful, malicious and completely crazy claims, but did not offer any FACTS nor CREDIBLE DOCUMENTATION to support its claims.

      Right wing bloggers were then asked to publish the stories (I personally know of one well known blogger who received $ contribution via his Paypal Donate after publishing the piece), and it began to be repeated in other moderate and/or non-political sites; all the while, without offering any evidence, and yet, like you, demanding Obama to disprove of the wild allegations.

      If you apologize, I might even provide a copy of the original book which have made you abandon your sense of ethics and common sense, driven by an unnatural hate of Obama – successfully perpetuated by the very book.

      On the other hand, if you start on another silly rant, then I will just ignore you and let everyone read your comments for themselves.

      • SignPainterGuy 6:17 PM on 11/02/2011 Permalink | Reply

        First, good try, a for effort, but no, what I believe to be true about Obozo is not based on any book, but from his own statements telecast worldwide for all to see. I do not hate anyone, but I do hate what some people do.

        Obama has proved to me he is no Christian by his statement, “There are many paths to Heaven.” No Christian believes that. He recited perfectly numerous islamic “sayings” (I don`t remember there names), has a history of islamic teachings when a child, the most formative years. His own statements about the people he associated with from his teen years onward and his socialist policies mark him as a socialist in the marxist fashion. He stated in `05 or `06 that he was born in Kenya. Kenyan parliament at least twice claimed him as their own. He has promised to create jobs, make the environment better for business, bring down unemployment, and on and on, in his own words, NOT from any book. That makes him a liar.

        I reiterate; Oblamer is a marxist socialist liar and most likely a muslim, AND, because his father was Kenyan and never even applied for US citizenship, contrary to the US Constitution which requires that BOTH parents be US Citizens, he is ineligible to be VP or pResident of the USA !

        You deserve no apology and none will be offered !

        • SignPainterGuy 6:47 PM on 11/02/2011 Permalink | Reply

          BTW, I post my comments on this blog precisely because I like all the bloggers, respect them and their works, whether I agree with every word or not, and I hope that my comments are read and that they are respected and thought provoking as are the posts. I can be wrong, but I will never say anything I don`t believe to be true, or with tongue planted firmly in cheek. I would hope that would be obvious !

          It is my intention to be respectful to all, macross, even mind-numbed sheeple such as youself !

    • Macross 8:44 PM on 11/02/2011 Permalink | Reply

      SignPainter Guy,
      Your arguments are disingenuous, myopic, and even dishonest on several occasions. And despite your claims of being respectful, you are definitely not.

      Obama’s statement was actually,
      “I am rooted in the Christian tradition. I believe there are many paths to the same place and that is a belief there is a higher power, a belief that we are connected as a people.’
      Chicago Sun-Times, 2008

      I always find it troubling that people would rephrase his statement, out of context, as proof of his un-Christianess. Using the same barometer, should we also question the faith of former President Bush? After all, he did say,

      “I don’t talk about a particular faith. I believe the Lord can work through many faiths, whether it be the Christian faith, the Jewish faith, Muslim faith, Hindu faith. When I speak of faith, I speak of all faiths, because there is a universal call, and that main universal call is to love your neighbor. It extends throughout all faith.”
      Houston Power Center, August 2003

      Furthermore, I never realized that fraternizing with people of different faiths, in this case Islam, constitutes heresy, and proof of one’s ‘Islam-ness’. If so, perhaps someone should explain that to former President Bush too, considering that he claimed Islam is a noble faith, after sitting in a prayer headed by a Muslim cleric, in honor of the Muslim festival Eid-al-Fitri. He also announced that, “For the first time in history, we’ve added the Quran to the White House library.” He followed that up with, pay attention SignPainterGuy, “We cannot carry the message of freedom and the baggage of bigotry at the same time.”

      This is the video: http://youtu.be/VaNKz2rDF04

      Also, this is a video of President Bush speaking inside a mosque! And horror of horrors, he apparently has read the Quran.

      “Let me quote from the Quran itself.
      In the long run, evil and the extreme, will be the end of those who do evil. For that they rejected the signs of Allah and held them up for ridicule.”

      This is the link: http://youtu.be/w0phxuzQ7sE

      Former President Bush, and his First Lady, Laura, should also be told that what they have done in the following pictures, is wrong and turns them into a Muslim. Right, SignPainter Guy?


      Next, I demand you prove your statement that Obama claimed he was born in Kenya. I say this now: You lied.

      Moving on, I see you are now trying to divert this topic to Obama’s policies. Typical. Anyway, which politician in the history of the world has ever fulfilled all of their campaign promises? How many campaign promises did Bush Jr., Clinton, Bush Sr. and Reagan break?

      Furthermore, do you realize that the economic recession which President Obama inherited, was the worst since 1937? Are you blind to the fact that $17 trillion dollars were wiped off from the wealth of Americans in that recession? Are you ignorant of the fact that Obama created more jobs in his first two years that Bush did over eight years? Do you also deny that the economy was shedding 700,000 jobs a month when Obama took over, and after an 11-month struggle, he has finally turned it around and there have been positive job numbers for the last year?

      Finally, I want you to prove your assertion that he is a Marxist. I say this again: You lied.

      And if short association with another Marxist is all you have, then I suggest we discuss if former presidents Bush, both of them, are Islamic Jihadis, considering that they had a close personal and business association with the Bin Ladens for almost three decades, and regularly hosts the Bin Ladens in their home.

      While we’re at it, we should also discuss former President Reagan’s socialist tendencies as well, seeing his support of unions (heck he even led a Union strike once). Furthermore, do not forget that Reagan was a big secret fan of the Keynesian economic model, secretly using deficit spending to build the economy which saw the federal debt rising over 300% during his eight years in office. Let’s also not forget that Reagan raised taxes in seven out of his eight years in office.

      And lastly, for heaven’s sake, stop talking about the Constitution. It’s embarrassing to read. You either have no idea what you are talking about, or you are once again, making things up.

      In light of your last statement, I must insist that you apologize for all of your lies, exaggerations and made up facts. It is clear now that you have no first hand knowledge of the things you said.

      • SignPainterGuy 1:34 AM on 11/03/2011 Permalink | Reply

        Nope, still no apology forthcoming, you don`t deserve it. You have resorted to name calling, a typical liberal/ regressive tactic. Childish.

        Bush was naive in his belief that islam is benign. Islam is islam. there is no moderate islam. He made a grave error in that respect as has Perry and many others.

        Obama inherited an economy that had already seen the negative effects of two years of dim controlled congress. He has also spent $4T in 3 years whereas Bush spent $5T in 8 years. He will reach 200% of Bushes rate of spending in half the time as Bush by the end of his one and only term, IF he isn`t impeached before then. I pray so.

        The Constitution is the foundation of our laws; there is NO reason to stop talking about the greatest single governing document written for a country.

        As for Obama`s statement of Kenyan birth, I saw it online from an interview by an Ohio newspaper reporter, who at the time of Obama`s running for state senate of IL. he asked Obama, “Where were you born?” Without hesitation, he answered, “Kenya”. That vid has since been scrubbed apparently, as I`ve never been able to find it, and the link disappeared when my hard drive crashed this spring and was replaced.

        My statements are of course paraphrased, but maintain the essence. I sleep well at night knowing that I never lie. I stand firm in my statements, nothing has changed, believe as you will. I re-reiterate; I am firmly convinced, Oblamer is a marxist socialist lying man-child and most likely a muslim. He is also an ineligible usurper pResidunce !

    • Macross 2:18 AM on 11/03/2011 Permalink | Reply

      ” You have resorted to name calling, a typical liberal/ regressive tactic. Childish.”
      And I supposed your posts here, from the very first one, were very adult? Here’s another one for you. Hypocrite.

      So when Bush (along with Perry and Reagan and so many more non-racists and experienced politcian) says things such as that, it is considered ‘naive’. But when Obama does, he is a Muslim? Hypocrite.

      As for him spending 4 trillion, that’s a lie. Again. First off, as per the Treasury Department, (Link: http://www.fms.treas.gov/mts/index.html), the Federal government has spent $2.6 trillion since the start of Obama’s presidency. Furthermore, the federal budget starts from October 1 – September 30. Which means, Obama’s spending only began in his first budget, which started on October 1 2009. Calculated as such, his spending total is $1.6 trillion. Also consider that his bailout of the auto industry (a successful policy), the government has recouped 90% of the money there. As for the bank bailouts, pushed through by both Bush and Obama, guess what? The banks (over 600 of them) are repaying the federal government since 2009. Those figures are unavailable, but even without that, guess what? http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6080/6088811201_96839c6977_b.jpg

      Wrt to the Kenyan birth claim and the imaginary video, with your track record of lying, do you think anyone will believe you? Furthermore, considering people like you have kept and dissected every single video of his since he entered into politics, and published it several times over, are we to believe that no one else has a copy of the video, and no news agency, including the press, have transcripts of it?

      As for the your Constitution comment, there is every reason for YOU to stop talking about it since you are a person of suspect character and is not above fabricating facts to support your claims. Just look at your earlier comment about the Constitution.

      You have made so many outrageous, misleading and false statement here, and when push comes to shove, you’ve failed to corroborate any of them. As I’ve said earlier, most of the criticisms directed towards Obama from the likes of you, especially the personal ones, are malicious lies, with absolutely no proof behind them. That you can ‘sleep well at night’, as you say, only shows that you lack character and integrity.

      On a final note, while you are basing your opinion on right wing conspiracy theorist (likely the same ones who are behind the Elenin, or Rothschild or Prince William is the anti-Christ theories), and spreading your politics of hate and racism, the rest of us will continue to base our opinions on facts.

      I am done with you, liar. Have a great day.

      • SignPainterGuy 5:33 PM on 11/03/2011 Permalink | Reply

        Is everyone reading this ?

        I`ve chosen to allow Macross what he desires, except for an apology, which is, “To be the smartest person in the room”. When we all leave, he can be !

Compose new post
Next post/Next comment
Previous post/Previous comment
Show/Hide comments
Go to top
Go to login
Show/Hide help
shift + esc