Tagged: political correctness Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Quite Rightly 1:50 PM on 11/12/2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , political correctness, ,   

    In June of 2009, Asia Bibi, mother of fi… 

    In June of 2009, Asia Bibi, mother of five, was working in the fields on the farm of Muslim landowner Muhammad Idrees, near the village of Ittanwali, when her boss told her to fetch some water for the rest of the crew.

    After Asia brought the water, some of the women–all Muslims–refused to drink it because it had been brought by a Christian, making it “unclean.” The women called Asia an “infidel” and called Christianity a “religion of infidels.”

    Asia reportedly responded by telling the Muslim women that Christ died on the cross for our sins. She told them Jesus is alive. “Our Christ is the true prophet of God,” she reportedly told them.

    Upon hearing this response, the Muslim women became angry and began to beat Asia.

    When Muslim men in nearby fields gathered to attack Asia, she fled to her home, but angry Muslims followed her, took her out of her home, severely beat her, and tortured her children.

    They announced from mosque loudspeakers that she would be punished by having her face blackened and being paraded through the village on a donkey.

    When local Christians informed the police, the police saved Asia’s life by taking her into custody, holding her in Nankana city “for her own safety.” Under pressure from local Muslim leaders, the police registered a blasphemy case against her.

    Two courts in Nankana found Asia guilty of the “crime” of blasphemy and, on November 8, 2010, Asia was fined US$1,190 and sentenced to death by hanging.

    Ashiq Masih, her husband, doesn’t have the heart to break the news to their two youngest daughters.

    “They asked me many times about their mother but I can’t get the courage to tell them that the judge has sentenced their mother to capital punishment for a crime she never committed.”

    Asia’s case is now under appeal, but she has been being held in isolation since June of 2009, essentially for the crime of sharing her Christian beliefs with her Muslim neighbors. Her family is one of only three Christian families in a village of more than 1,500 families. Asia’s family has lived in the village of Ittanwali for many generations.

    Between 1986 and August 2009, at least 974 people have been charged with blasphemy against Islam.

    This week, an anti-blasphemy resolution, “On Combating Defamation of Religion,” is coming to a vote at the U.N.

    Pakistan has been actively pushing for passage of this resolution since 1999.

    One thing you can count on, passage of this resolution will not offer protection for Christians, Jews, Buddhists, Hindus, Sikhs, or any other non-Muslims.

    More Shariah law, anyone?
    __________
    Cross-posted at Bread upon the Waters.

     
    • fuzislippers 1:59 PM on 11/12/2010 Permalink | Reply

      This is just one of hundreds of thousands of isolated incidents!

      Ugh. This story breaks my heart. We need to do more about blocking Sharia here. I mean it.

    • Quite Rightly 4:54 PM on 11/12/2010 Permalink | Reply

      And Americans keep getting told that we need to be more tolerant and teach our young people to appreciate Islam.

  • backyardconservative 2:42 PM on 11/11/2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , political correctness, ,   

    Person of the Year Prattle 

    What passes for debate at Time, via NRO’s Geraghty.

    2009 was Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke, for saving us all. Well, that remains to be seen. What fresh hell.

    2008 was Barack Obama. Ditto.

    2007 was the murderous Vlad Putin.

    I think Time owes us a good one. For a change.

    If they can’t bring themselves to name the eeevil Sarah Palin (because, after all, how many conservatives read Time) then the TEA Party would be a good choice. Just in the interest of their retaining a shred of journalistic integrity. Or they too may be sold for a dollar.

    Who’s your pick, folks?

     
    • fuzislippers 2:46 PM on 11/11/2010 Permalink | Reply

      I voted for Glenn Beck this year, he’s done a lot to wake people up. But given Time’s record, they’ll probably go with Ahmadinejad who’s made such amazing progress with his nuclear program.

      • backyardconservative 2:47 PM on 11/11/2010 Permalink | Reply

        Right on both counts:)

        • rubyslipperblog 3:52 PM on 11/11/2010 Permalink | Reply

          I am surprised Meggie Mac didn’t nominate herself. I am going to have to cast my vote for Barack Obama, he’s had such a rough year and all. How long has it been since someone handed him a prize anyway, he’s overdue. /

          Seriously, I would have to think about it some more. In addition to the names mentioned here already, I would consider Paul Ryan or Marco Rubio possibly. I have to say that of all the candidates I actually met, I loved Pat Toomey but he didn’t get the national attention or do as much to influence public awakening. On a one-on-one basis, he struck me as the warmest and most sincere man you could hope for. You’d never pick that up from his television appearances though.

          I was bummed I didn’t get to actually get to shake Sarah Palin’s hand but her star power is really something to see first hand. No doubt about it she really shakes up the national conversation too. They’d never nominate her, especially with Meggie Mac speaking for the right (what a joke). Credit where credit is due – she did pick the Tea Party and Beck. Both are good choices.

          • backyardconservative 7:58 PM on 11/11/2010 Permalink | Reply

            We did have an amazing number of wonderful people come forward this year.

            I was surprised too Meggie had the wisdom for those picks.

            I wish she would go get a real job instead of trading off her dad’s success. Dissing Christine O’Donnell who has actually had the guts to run for office I thought was particularly nasty on Meggie’s part.

    • nicedeb 6:30 PM on 11/11/2010 Permalink | Reply

      Is the tea party a choice? That’s who I’d pick.

    • Tyson Vandevelde 12:24 AM on 11/12/2010 Permalink | Reply

      Interesting…I am gunna have to look into this a little more

    • Jill 7:35 AM on 11/12/2010 Permalink | Reply

      I wouldn’t be surprised to see Nancy, or Nancy and Harry, on the cover. Or Jon Stewart.

      How about Chris Christie?

    • backyardconservative 9:16 AM on 11/12/2010 Permalink | Reply

      Who does Time want to lionize this year. A good question. You may be right, Jill. There may be doubling down with Nancy and Harry. Stewart would be a cute duck from responsibility for a decision.

      Maybe grudging respect for Christie.

  • backyardconservative 9:33 AM on 10/28/2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , political correctness   

    Obama the PC Media Punchline. It Begins 

    We had the CNN piece on the slurpee shtick–bored with Barack.

    We have a NY columnist talking openly about the president’s “diminishing brand” and speaking of him as his own First Lady.

    Now the WaPo’s Dana Milbank, who loves to lampoon from the left, openly mocks the Barackstar: On the Daily Show, Obama is the last laugh.

    What do you do when you’re not cool any more?

    Dude.

    –More at Memeorandum.

    More. Well, well. The NY Times The Caucus. According to them this is what was cut from the show due to the president boring on, uh, time constraints:

    The interview went longer than Mr. Stewart expected – so long, in fact, that the show’s producers decided to cut out the original introduction Mr. Stewart taped, which include a riff of him fiddling with a pen and drumming his fingers on the table while making the president wait, and his introduction of Mr. Obama as “White House chairman of the council of Economic Advisers Austan Goolsbee’s boss.’’ A spokeswoman for the show said it was the first time the show consisted of a single interview.

    Even nastier stuff. How interesting. What will Stewart do to motivate the vote at his Saturday rally?

     
    • rubyslipperblog 7:54 PM on 10/28/2010 Permalink | Reply

      Thanks for linking. I feel like I am going to drown this week I am so busy.

      What do you do when you’re not cool anymore? I guess Obama’s answer is to hang out with those ultra cool progressive bloggers. I would love to see a transcript from the think-tank meeting that came up with the “Obama meets with bloggers” game plan. If these are the supposed smart people, I will stick with being a stupid racist.

    • backyardconservative 10:06 PM on 10/28/2010 Permalink | Reply

      Stupid racists forever!!!:)

      His last ditch attempt. How pathetic.

      I think Iowa Hawk took a stab at it:)

      http://iowahawk.typepad.com/iowahawk/2010/10/one-afternoon-in-the-office-of-the-powerful-man-on-earth.html

      • rubyslipperblog 12:08 AM on 10/29/2010 Permalink | Reply

        LOL:

        PRESIDENT OBAMA
        By golly, we got us a big fella here! That’s quite a suit you have on. Do you mind if I ask who your tailor is?

        OLIVER WILLIS
        Thank you Mr. President. It’s actually the dust cover for Mr. Soros’ Bentley. My mom added the lapels.

  • backyardconservative 1:20 PM on 10/06/2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , political correctness   

    Get your vulture fart carbon credits 

    What do you do if you create some rodent roadkill with your Prius?

    The left’s plenary indulgences for a price. Mental anguish and otherwise.

    Noise pollution? More mental anguish.

    I still remember Bill Clinton’s eagle launch.

    …In contrast, Joe Miller has a bear permit. HT NRO.

    And consumers are backing away from social statements.

    Seriously, though, the left has gone way too far. As we’ve all noted, the 1010 group let the mad mask slip. James Taranto asks what kind of people blow up children, and notes where we have heard this before.

    We are all roadkill now to them, hmm.

     
    • rubyslipperblog 9:35 PM on 10/06/2010 Permalink | Reply

      Catchy title Anne. The left takes this nonsense to the point it is almost comical then they take it just a tad further for good measure. I would love to see some lefty pols campaign on this in this environment. In fact I dare them.

    • backyardconservative 10:33 PM on 10/06/2010 Permalink | Reply

      Excellent!:)

    • Quite Rightly 8:43 PM on 10/09/2010 Permalink | Reply

      These guys still believe squirrels and chipmunks should be allowed to breathe?

  • backyardconservative 12:35 PM on 10/04/2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , political correctness,   

    Or are men more tolerant than women?:) 

    Geraghty in Morning Jolt:

    The conservative blogosphere takes up an issue near and dear to my heart, political mixed-marriages. It began from a New York Times article profiling some couples, including NR’s Richard Brookheiser and his wife Jeanne Safer.

    Neo-neo-con observes, “Note that, in the marriages described in the article, it’s the woman who’s the liberal and the man who’s the conservative. This ties in with statistics showing that, ever since a transition time somewhere during the 70s or early 80s, women consistently have been more likely to vote Democrat and men Republican. . .. I’ve personally known a number of marriages of the mixed political variety. Almost all of them have conformed to this Democrat-woman Republican-man pattern. Almost all of them seem to be working out pretty well. In the olden days, the couples I knew used to laugh that they shouldn’t bother to vote because their votes always canceled each other out. Now, however, there’s a lot less laughter.”

    I don’t know. I’m laughing.

    “Luckily many wives view their husbands as barely functional Neanderthals so it’s often not a huge stretch for guys,” quips Maetenloch at Ace of Spades.

    Mrs. CampaignSpot hates appearing in my columns, but there’s no way to address this issue without drawing from personal experience. I read the incredulous responses and am surprised at how much other people are surprised. At the end of the day, there is a lot more to life than politics. If the paramount priority of a relationship was to be with someone who was similar to you, we would all be homosexual. If you find somebody who you love, who loves you, who can put up with your quirks and foibles, and whose quirks and foibles only drive you up the wall in the good ways, grab them. You have the rest of your lives to plant seeds of doubt about their usual political notions.

    What do we think about this? Are men more tolerant than women?:) As the discussion goes, you usually don’t see a conservative woman married to a liberal guy. Carville and Matalin the exception. (But then, is James Carville your usual leftist?)

    As for me, I grew up as a Dem (where Dems were anti-commie and pro-life) and when I met my spouse wondered how a (Goldwater) Republican could be so nice. Now I’m more conservative than he is. And less nice:)

    And probably the stultifying political correctness had something to do with my recognition I didn’t belong as a Dem–major intolerance there.

    P.S. And interestingly, as we’ve seen this election year, women, a lot of whom are independents, may have their biggest impact through the TEA party. They’re looking at the burden on the next generation and getting involved as never before.

    It may be even some single women don’t see Big Government as a reliable provider.

     
    • Retriever 12:54 PM on 10/04/2010 Permalink | Reply

      Your second to last paragraph describes me pretty well! :)

    • backyardconservative 1:11 PM on 10/04/2010 Permalink | Reply

      Good to know:)

    • James 1:48 PM on 10/04/2010 Permalink | Reply

      My wife and I rarely discuss how we will vote for fear one will change a vote out of spite.

    • Jill 5:13 PM on 10/04/2010 Permalink | Reply

      Great post. I was a default-liberal when I met my very conservative husband in college. (He’s nicer than I am, too. :) )

      His theory, which seems to hold up about 95% of the time, is that women vote for the candidate with the best hair. Think about it. :) Though Obama’s hair is nothing to write home about, McCain’s was a non-starter.

    • pjMom 2:18 PM on 10/05/2010 Permalink | Reply

      And the Breck girl.

      Our love affair was precisely the opposite: I flirted with liberalism in high school but became increasingly conservative through my early 20s. My husband grew up in a SO CAL Republican, which is another way of saying RINO. I’m happy that I jolted him out of the usual male It’s-not-my-body-therefore-excuse of supporting abortion rights. And that my comon-sense logic beat law school logic on the inherent unfairness of progressive taxation. Flat rate, baby, all the way.

      But he is nicer. At least as far as politics go… ; )

    • backyardconservative 3:47 PM on 10/05/2010 Permalink | Reply

      Well done!:)

      Flat rate baby, all the way!

    • pjMom 10:20 AM on 10/06/2010 Permalink | Reply

      Darn skippy. If the Russians can do it, by golly, so can we. ; )

  • backyardconservative 6:40 PM on 08/30/2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , political correctness,   

    Chicago-Amsterdam Flight Terror Arrest 

    Boxcutters and cellphone taped to Pepto-Bismol. A test run.

    Checked the luggage to Yemen but boarded the flight to Amsterdam.

    Why Chicago.

    …Lots of activity lately.

    More here.

     
    • Yukio Ngaby 7:14 PM on 08/30/2010 Permalink | Reply

      I guess the good thing is that these two were caught.

      Gotta wonder how many dry runs have passed through the airport security before this…

    • backyardconservative 8:04 PM on 08/30/2010 Permalink | Reply

      Lots to wonder about.

      I suppose they let them get on to see who they would meet up with, once they saw no explosives.

      Still, it creeps me out.

  • backyardconservative 10:26 AM on 08/25/2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , political correctness, ,   

    Do we want a theocracy of terror here? 

    Video. Holocaust Survivor Cursed Out by Ground Zero Mosque Supporter

    Jonah Goldberg:

    Here’s a thought: The 70 percent of Americans who oppose what amounts to an Islamic Niketown two blocks from Ground Zero are the real victims of a climate of hate, and the much-ballyhooed anti-Muslim backlash is mostly a myth.

    Let’s start with some data.

    Americans are more aware than ever the PC media is cowardly, malicious and IGNORANT–willfully or just your usual leftie navel-gazing–when it comes to defending our freedom.

    More at my spot.

    …We are well aware. Bread Upon the Waters. Nice Deb.

     
    • Yukio Ngaby 11:43 AM on 08/25/2010 Permalink | Reply

      You know the GZM is taking up way too much of the Right blogoshere’s time. I’m against the Ground Zero Mosque. It’s become an emotional and divisive issue. But that’s it. At worst, the building would be a PR coup for Islamic extremists and an insult to America, and most especially to the Americans and the families of Americans who lost their lives there. Let’s not trivialize that, but let’s still keep some perspective here.

      Shouldn’t we be more concerned with issues that can have real and deveatating consquences, issues like Iran’s nuclear capability, Obama’s selling out of Israel and other global allies, ObamaCare, etc.?

      And this comment isn’t directed at you, BackyardConservative. I know that you post about all sorts of relevant issues, and I admire you for it.

      • backyardconservative 12:21 PM on 08/25/2010 Permalink | Reply

        Well, yes, I see your point. All these issues are important.

        But I would say the Ground Zero Mosque debate brings home what’s at stake in the world–and helps engage Americans on Israel, Iran.

        And I guess the subtext is the contempt with which the PC media holds Americans–and how much they lie and distort–on this and other issues, like ObamaCare

        • Yukio Ngaby 12:37 PM on 08/25/2010 Permalink | Reply

          I think your assertion was correct about two weeks ago. That sounds condescending, but I don’t mean that way.

          I think the debate has become so intense and emotion-based now that all metaphorical side-issues and subtexts have become forgotten, lost or moot. Now it’s solely about winning (either building the mosque there or not) and nothing else.

          “deveatating consquences” *sigh* I really can splle. Rellay…

  • Quite Rightly 4:29 PM on 08/15/2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , political correctness,   

    Why Won’t Bloomberg Let A Church Destroyed on 9/11 Rebuild? 

    Saint Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church, which was destroyed on 9/11 by the collapse of the Twin Towers, has spent NINE YEARS trying to get building permits. Nine. Long. Years.

    From Fr. Constantine J. Simones Waterford, courageous pastor of St. Nicholas Church:

    Shame on Mayor Michael  Bloomberg and the members of his Landmarks Preservation Commission for  voting 9-0 to allow the building of a Muslim mosque at ground zero in  New York City.

    Too many Americans are sleepwalking when it comes  to understanding Islamic policies during the last 1,400 years of what I  see as its brutal history. No one talks about St. Nicholas Greek  Orthodox Church, which was crushed by the collapsing Twin Towers.

    Why  is the mosque put on the fast track to construction when St. Nicholas’  reconstruction is being hindered by New York City bureaucracy?

    Wake  up, America, before it is too late. The Greek Orthodox faithful of the  Balkans were enslaved by Islam for 500 years. Ask me what it means to  live under the laws of Islam, under Sharia Law and the Hadith. Call me  and I will provide a history lesson on what can be like to live under  Islam extremists.

    Fr. Constantine J. Simones Waterford

    About the St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church:

    Since  1922, St. Nicholas Church had stood as a quiet sanctuary of prayer and  reflection amidst the tumultuous and bustling crossroads of commerce.  For the past nine years the Port Authority of New York/New Jersey has  used bureaucratic obstacles and false promises to hinder the rebuilding  of the St. Nicholas Church.

    As Nice Deb (who has published an excellent commentary about the Ground Zero mosque, don’t miss it) pointed out:

    City officials, eager to deflect the criticism of a righteously outraged  public, claim that nothing can be done [to stop the mosque from being built on hallowed ground]… something that anyone who has  contended with zoning boards across the country knows to be untrue.

    Ask the congregation of the St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church of New York City.

    Many thanks to patriot Chris Wysocki at Wyblog for a heads up on the Ground Zero Church. You’ll want to read his report on moderate Muslims in New York (and watch the video) here.

    Cross-posted at Bread upon the Waters.

     
    • nicedeb 9:24 PM on 08/15/2010 Permalink | Reply

      Grrrrrrrrrrr! Now I’m really mad!

    • pjMom 12:41 AM on 08/16/2010 Permalink | Reply

      Ditto nicedeb. So much for tolerance and diversity, eh?

    • Shredderofmass 6:56 AM on 08/16/2010 Permalink | Reply

      Republica candidate for congress and Harvard Physicist Mike Stopa says he would not want a Mosque in his Neighborhood.
      http://www.stopaforusrep.com/blog/95-comments-on-mosques
      See this same content at a great pro-Israel site
      http://llphfreedom.blogspot.com/2010/08/two-comments-on-issue-of-mosques-by.html

    • Jack 9:04 PM on 08/16/2010 Permalink | Reply

      Shared you and NiceDeb on Facebook…two awesome articles.

    • Jim 9:57 PM on 08/16/2010 Permalink | Reply

      Good question!

    • Investigator 12:00 AM on 08/17/2010 Permalink | Reply

      I may be wrong about this… but a little investigation seems to indicate that “Fr. Constantine J. Simones Waterford, courageous pastor of St. Nicholas Church” may not actually exist. The only reference to him that I can find is the same text posted in the blog that started this thread. In fact the only places he shows up is in blogs… each of which contain the same text. It may turn out that the text, and the fictitional Fr. Constantine, was simply fabricated in order to incite unrest.

      The web site for St. Nicholas Church NYC says this:
      “Our priest, Father John Romas, has been temporarily assigned to St. Constantine and Helen Greek Orthodox Cathedral at 64 Schemerhorn Street in Brooklyn. St. Constantine and Helen’s Congregation have also warmly welcomed the Congregation of St. Nicholas as we work to rebuild our Church.”

      http://www.stnicholasnyc.com/?page_id=7

      Another story from NYTimes indicates that the major problem the rebuild project has faced is one of acquiring land; enough land to build a new church six times the size of the original for the 70 families that comprise the parish membership. While the church has retained the original 1200 square foot lot that the original four story church stood on, it is apparently not big enough for the new church they want to build.

      • Quite Rightly 12:42 PM on 08/17/2010 Permalink | Reply

        My bad. This is what happens when a writer doesn’t go back to original sources but relies on other people’s reporting. After further investigation on my part, I have concluded that the Greek Orthodox cleric in question does indeed exist but that his name and actual location have gotten garbled somewhere along the line during reprints. (More in next comment.)

      • Quite Rightly 12:50 PM on 08/17/2010 Permalink | Reply

        The delay in rebuilding the Church does not seem to result from any bad faith or “land grabbing” on the part of the Church. Originally, the Church was assured by then NY Governor Pataki that they could rebuild on the original location. However, the Port Authority wanted the Church’s land and offered the Church a land swap, which the Church accepted. But the Port Authority has never concluded the deal (more).

      • Quite Rightly 12:59 PM on 08/17/2010 Permalink | Reply

        We all know that building projects everywhere in the U.S. routinely get ensnarled in red tape, and the Ground Zero site presents many more than the usual issues. So, the glaring question in all of this for me is: How is it that the Ground Zero Mosque is getting escorted to the finish line with the support of the NYC mayor, the State Department, and even the president of the United States. Where is support for St. Nicholas Church? Reference: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/03/nyregion/03trade.html?pagewanted=1&n=Top/Reference/Times%20Topics/People/B/Bagli,%20Charles%20V&_r=1

    • Don 8:06 AM on 08/17/2010 Permalink | Reply

      I bet you could not build this church in Tehran ! I’m not from N.Y. city,so it really is non of my business,
      but building a mosque at Ground Zero is spitting in our faces,there are plenty around the corner…….If all of this is untrue then I agree with “Investigator “.

    • Grace Taylor 11:59 AM on 08/17/2010 Permalink | Reply

      There is a retired Greek Orthodox priest with the name of Fr. Constantine Simones.
      In 2006, and maybe today for all I know, he lived in Waterford, CT.
      He has been involved in Justice for Cyprus. Cyprus, as you will remember, is currently 37% occupied by Muslims in the form of the Turkish army.
      A link which I think satisfactorily proves he exists: http://news.pseka.net/index.php?module=sponsor

      • Quite Rightly 7:37 PM on 08/19/2010 Permalink | Reply

        Thank you, Grace.

        Also, the rebuilt church will need to be much larger to accommodate a large number of the visitors to the 9/11 memorial, once it is completed.

    • Crosshairball 12:08 PM on 08/18/2010 Permalink | Reply

      Hello Quite Rightly,

      I hope you don’t mind, but I have posted this post in it’s entirety over at Crosshairball. I did link back to here and attributed the post to Quite Rightly. I wanted to contact you first to ask permission but can’t find an email link. I figured this would be ok because of the cross posting part at the bottom of the post.

      Cross-posted at Bread upon the Waters.

    • Ignatz 10:39 AM on 08/19/2010 Permalink | Reply

      Quite: The mosque is 4 blocks away in an area of abandoned stores. That’s why there’s no red tape,

      • Quite Rightly 8:19 AM on 08/20/2010 Permalink | Reply

        Ignatz – Respectfully, I think you should check out the aerial views, widely available on the Web, including here. The actual distance from Ground Zero rubble to the mosque site is less than 600 feet, about 200 steps. Pace it off. In fact, a piece of the first airliner to hit the WTC plunged through the roof and top floor of the Burlington Coat Factory. How far away from Ground Zero is that?

    • Rachel 3:42 PM on 08/20/2010 Permalink | Reply

      The First Amendment of the Bill of Rights.

      “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

      http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/bill_of_rights_transcript.html

      Free exercise of religion. One of OUR founding principles. I am suprised no one has brought this up yet. You CANNOT argue about freedom of religion and just mean Christianity. If the founders had meant freedom of Christianity, they would have said “Freedom of Christianity” and not free exercise of “RELIGION”.

      Yes, the bombing of the Twin Towers was horrific, but so are many other acts of violence toward any PERSON. Pardon me for my sarcasm, but I find it hypocritical to label all Muslims under the ‘extremist’ label, when there are numerous ‘extremist’s of EVERY RELIGION.

      Oh yeah, lets not forget that Judaism, Christianity, AND Islam all worship the SAME GOD. “Oooohhh, no, those MUSLIMS want to build a place to WORSHIP GOD, GOD FORBID!!!” Phht, personally, I dont think God cares how He gets worshiped, as long as people believe in Him, and try to follow the Ten Commandments.

    • ThatGuy 3:53 PM on 08/22/2010 Permalink | Reply

      Did you read the entire article?

      “In keeping with the archbishop’s vision, Mr. Koutsomitis planned for a roughly 24,000-square-foot marble church and adjoining spiritual center at an estimated cost of up to $40 million. But church leaders say they have raised only $4 million. JPMorgan Chase has agreed to give $10 million toward the rebuilding of St. Nicholas, as part of the bank’s tentative deal to build an office tower on the site of the Deutsche Bank building. ”

      I wonder why you’re having trouble getting going.

      “The church wants the authority to provide roughly $55 million toward the estimated $75 million cost of rebuilding St. Nicholas.”

      Wow.

      Also, lets not even begin to get into the sheer amount of ignorance and bigotry it takes to even oppose this. Suppose the trade center was destroyed by a group of lunatic pro-lifers (no attempt at disrespect is intended here by the way) and people were protesting the rebuilding of this very church? How would you feel if the actions of others skewed their opinion on not only you but your faith? Do you really think there were no Muslims in the building that day? Do you really feel as though Islam-practicing American-born citizens didn’t feel exactly as you did on 9/11?

      • Quite Rightly 10:48 AM on 09/11/2010 Permalink | Reply

        @ That Guy: Perhaps you missed the part of the article that pointed out that the Port Authority would require the church to install a $35-million blast-proof concrete slab beneath its building to protect it from a possible explosion on the screening center ramps. That $35 million is a Port Authority estimate, by the way, which means, of course, that the actual cost will be much more.

    • Anna 9:44 AM on 09/11/2010 Permalink | Reply

      A article from the Greek Orthodox Observer:

      On September 11, 2001 the barbaric attack not only destroyed the majestic Twin Towers but also the tiny yet historic St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church, located south of the second tower of the World Trade Center. In the aftermath of its destruction, very little survived: two icons, one of St. Dionysios of Zakynthos and the other of the Zoodochos Pege, along with a few liturgical items, a book, and some candles.

      Within days, the Archbishop traveled personally to Ground Zero, setting foot on the site where the Church of St. Nicholas stood, in order to conduct a memorial service for the victims of those who perished in the attacks and to offer prayers for the families in mourning.

      On the Feast Day of St. Nicholas, December 6, the Archbishop, joined by His Eminence Archbishop Iakovos and area clergy, celebrated a somber Vespers and memorial service near where the Church once stood. Six months after the attacks, His All Holiness Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew also journeyed to this sacred site and presided at a memorial service with family members of the victims.

      Though small in stature, St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church was a place of ministry and worship both for her parishioners and also for local residents and workers in the Financial District of Manhattan who would pass by and often enter the Church. Following its collapse, the legacy of this tiny Church continues to dramatically impact peoples’ lives, and donations of almost $2 million have been received, as well as additional pledges of construction materials and appointments for the complete rebuilding of the Church. The city of Bari, Italy, where the relics of St. Nicholas were originally bestowed, has donated $250,000. The government of Greece has contributed $750,000 to these efforts, and the Ecumenical Patriarchate has given $50,000. The Governor of the State of New York, George Pataki, met with the Archbishop and pledged his support for including a new St. Nicholas in the redevelopment of the World Trade Center site.

      The task of rebuilding the Church of St. Nicholas involves careful coordination, planning and vision. To this end, His Eminence Archbishop Demetrios has appointed a committee to oversee the rebuilding project. In accomplishing their objectives, the committee has met with the Lower Manhattan Development Corporation so that the task of rebuilding St. Nicholas may be properly incorporated into the concept plans for the reconstruction of the World Trade Center site located at Ground Zero. These concept plans, which are the product of an inclusive process, envision the rebuilding of the historic Church of St. Nicholas as a functioning parish, ministering once again to the needs of her faithful. His Eminence, however, also sees the rebuilding of St. Nicholas as a matter of spiritual destiny, so that the millions of people who will visit the historic site of Ground Zero may find marking the place of a national tragedy, a sanctuary of solace and prayer, a concrete and visible testimony of renewed faith and hope.

      ——————————————————————————–
      Just another point. This church has been there since 1922.

    • Quite Rightly 10:44 AM on 09/11/2010 Permalink | Reply

      Thank you, Anna.

    • K.West 10:04 AM on 11/27/2010 Permalink | Reply

      Attention to all!!!!

      Read Psalms 37

      K.W.

    • Aphrodite 5:26 PM on 12/05/2010 Permalink | Reply

      Why is Mayor Bloomberg eager to build a mosque at Ground Zero but the only church destroyed on 9/11 he is against? This church was build back in 1922 and stood proudly for over 79 years without one incident. Yet, the Muslims who hijacked our planes and successfully murdered 3,000 of our citizens are allowed to build a mosque! Mayor Bloomberg says it freedom of religion but he is against a church being built on the site it was before the terrorists attack. What happened to diversity Mr. Bloomberg? Why do you hate Christians and not Muslims? When did a Greek Orthodox Christian ever destroyed anything in America? The faithful have raised money to rebuild our church. The people of Bari Italy donated money to rebuild our church. Why? Does it make sense? No. Today is the eve of St. Nicholas. Our church member will hold a mass at the site. Let’s see how many media attention this will get. Let’s see if Mayor Bloomberg shows his face.

      Lets pray the Church will be built and we hold a Mass in the new church next year the 10th anniversary of the day it was destroyed. If not it’s another victory for Turkey and AlQueda destroying churches and getting away with it. Remember Hagia Sophia in Constantinople and Apostolos Andreas in Cyprus.

      • Quite Rightly 6:27 PM on 12/05/2010 Permalink | Reply

        @Aphrodite

        Many others also feel the terrible injustice of so much support and attention going to the Ground Zero mosque when your beautiful Church, the St. Nicholas clergy and parishioners, and all the people of the neighborhood who visited that Church, are being all but completely ignored.

        I posted an announcement about the St. Nicholas vespers service (held, I note with sorrow, in a tent) at Bread upon the Waters.

        We must keep spreading the word.

  • backyardconservative 9:40 PM on 08/10/2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , political correctness,   

    Gutfeld on Beck. Suspicious Packages 

    On his gay bar idea next to the Ground Zero Mosque. Video.

    …but you know, in Iran it’s OK to pimp your mosque. Pedophiles welcome.

    P.S.

    The women can tweet only when a brother or other male relative is beating them.

    Um, do we think stoning is evil? Or what.

    One brave Muslim woman.

    –crossposted at BackyardConservative

     
  • Mary Sue 3:23 PM on 07/29/2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , political correctness,   

    Most Articulate President Ever: Obama calls African-Americans a ‘mongrel people’ on The View 

    Via Memeorandum

    Perhaps President Obama should have taken Ed Rendell’s advice and skipped the estrogen fest we have come to know as “The View:”

    When asked about his background, which includes a black father and white mother, Obama said of African-Americans: “We are sort of a mongrel people.”

    “I mean we’re all kinds of mixed up,” Obama said. “That’s actually true of white people as well, but we just know more about it.”

    The Hill gets out the mop to clean up after that disaster:

    The president’s remarks were directed at the roots of all Americans. The definition of mongrel as an adjective is defined as “of mixed breed, nature, or origin,” according to dictionary.com.

    Obama did not appear to be making an inflammatory remark with his statement and the audience appeared to receive it in the light-hearted manner that often accompanies interviews on morning talk shows.

    Yes of course we often hear that light-hearted banter from the Jerry Springer genre. When in Rome as they say…

    Oh but there is more -Read the rest at Ruby Slippers

     
  • backyardconservative 7:18 PM on 07/15/2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , political correctness   

    Collective Score Blanketball and Other Nightmares 

    Living like a liberal. Let them count the ways.

    Some conservative apres-beach reading from Matt Labash, The Weekly Standard

    I especially enjoy the Parenting Liberally part, naturally. Sounds like he has cute kids in spite of the modern liberal torture he is putting them through.

    More living like a liberal news, alternative reality version, via Ace: Sheila Jackson-Lee: I’m So Glad That We Won In Vietnam And That Both Vietnams, North and South, Live Together In Peace Side-By-Side

    I guess we can all get along if we let a few things slide. Like History. Geography. Culture.

    The country.

    P.S. More on Jackson-Lee from Moonbattery.

     
  • backyardconservative 8:54 AM on 06/07/2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , identity politics, political correctness,   

    The Political Rape of Nikki Haley 

    Much as I mostly disagree with Kathleen Parker, the WaPo excuse for a sort of rightie who went for Obama in a big way, she’s mostly right on this one. Aside from the credibility of Folks. And how can we forget her disgusting column suggesting John McCain had the hots for Palin and that’s why he chose her as his VP. As No Sheeples notes in the previous post, some have no decent experience, some have not learned from experience. Perhaps Parker has. Maybe she is atoning for that:

    This obsession with people’s personal lives, including the hand-wringing analyses of Al and Tipper Gore’s marriage, has turned us into a nation of purse-lipped old maids. No offense to purses. I’ve resisted commenting on the Gores’ decision to split after 40 years of marriage because what possibly could I know? Apologies to the deeply conflicted, but the Gores’ divorce has no bearing whatsoever on my life.

    I reluctantly decided to weigh in on the Haley story because therein lie issues of more general consequence. This isn’t only politics at its worst. It’s a persecution, a witch hunt, a political rape. “All I know to do is fight,” said Haley by phone Friday. “Just stay strong and keep a smile on your face. . . . I refuse to let this distract me.”

    As we know there is a special virulence reserved for conservative women, not only political bloggers, but those who run for office.

    It’s brutish power, it’s thuggish warning. It makes it more difficult for women to run, especially if they have families, especially young ones.

    How to combat this? Shine a light on the ugliness. Shame those who would shame.

    The Clintons wrung their hands about the politics of personal destruction even as they engaged in it. Democrat identity politics demonize those who don’t conform. The Left, led by this president resort to ad hominem attacks when they can’t debate the issue.

    And now we see this same kind of nastiness in a Republican primary in South Carolina. Shame on those men. And if you can, Vote Nikki Haley tomorrow. Standing strong.

     
  • Quite Rightly 10:30 AM on 06/05/2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , political correctness   

    Ground Zero Mosque Imam Sponsors Gaza Blockade Run 

    The New York Post is reporting that Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, the point man for the planned Ground Zero mega-mosque, “is a key figure” in the group that is the biggest donor to the Free Gaza Movement, which is “a key organizer of the six-ship flotilla that tried to break Israel’s blockade of the Hamas-run Gaza strip.” The group, called Perdana Global Peace Organization [it’s always about peace, isn’t it] is based in Malaysia. Their donation? $366,000 (“so far’). The imam’s participation was published on the group’s own Web site.

    Efforts to reach Imam Abdul Rauf yesterday for comment were unsuccessful.

    He’ll think of something to say. Maybe he’s on the phone with Mayor Bloomberg right now coordinating their press releases. Meanwhile, New Yorkers are preparing for a protest against the mega-mosque to be held tomorrow noon at the corner of Church and Liberty Streets at Ground Zero.

    Deborah Burlingame, the sister of the American Airlines pilot whose hijacked plane struck the Pentagon on Sept. 11, 2001, said the indirect ties of the imam to the protesters who confronted Israeli forces Monday were not surprising.

    “I think it goes to show he is not the man he represents himself to be. We have two Imam Raufs,” she said.

    “We have the anti-Israel, anti-democratic imam, and we have the smiling, soft-spoken moderate Muslim who says ‘Why can’t we all get along?’

    The Free Gaza Movement is a charity that has made nine seaborne aid missions in the past two years to break the Israeli blockade.

    Cross-posted at Bread upon the Waters.

     
    • fuzislippers 8:58 PM on 06/05/2010 Permalink | Reply

      This mosque is an insult to America, and I can’t believe that anyone thinks it’s a good idea to allow it to be built. We know exactly what it represents to the Islamic terrorists, they haven’t done a thing to hide their true motives except to lie in public, but I can’t believe that anyone in government doesn’t understand, doesn’t know that it represents triumph and that they’ve “conquered” that land.

      As to the shady funding links to the terrorists who are trying to destroy Israel, color me unsurprised. They are the same people, same goals, same methods, same same same. What I want to know is how involved this WH was; it seems all his radical and commie pals were funding it.

      • Quite Rightly 8:11 PM on 06/06/2010 Permalink | Reply

        I don’t want to believe that anyone thinks its a good idea to allow this mosque to be built, but it’s Twilight Zone time again. I am forced to succumb to the apparent reality that surrounds me, which is that a good many of the people in my community think this mosque is just another opportunity to demonstrate that old, boring freedom of religion. I cannot fathom it;I cannot expIain it. I know from direct experience that these same people are pushed to the edge of their tolerance if an evangelist from one of the proselitizing Christian sects shows up at their door with a couple of free pamphlets and an invitation to say a prayer, but a mosque positioned so that worshipers can literally look down on Ground Zero while they pray–that presents no problem to them and raises no alarms, except that they might encounter some shameless “bigotry” by some lout who opposes the idea. All the Muslims tthey know–all of them–they are quite sure, are paragons of tolerance. I don’t get it. I know people whose apartments looked down on Ground Zero while it was still smoking, and I know others who refuse to believe that was a traumatic experience. I know many people who thought the U.S. had it coming. Truly. At today’s rally in NYC against the building of the Ground Zero mosque, maybe 5,000 – 10,000 people showed up. In New York City, population 8 million. That’s a pretty small number, something like 7 people per thousand. Here in Progressive Paradise, that percentage of the population will show up on an hour’s notice to demonstrate against Israel’s “war on Gaza.” There are plenty of people who think it’s a good idea for this mosque to be built, and a great many more who think it’s existence is irrelevant.

        • fuzislippers 11:36 AM on 06/07/2010 Permalink | Reply

          The problem is that they do not understand the intention of Islam, its reason for being in a way. As usual, the western world thinks it can pat the uncivilized heathens on their head, give them a lollipop (or mosque), and good will springs forth from their kind tolerance and benevolence. Everything is wrong with that theory, not the least of which is the fact that they see white Christians and patriots (as represented by the cross and the flag, which must be banned) as the threat, while they roll out the red carpet for the real threat to their very existence. Idiots, morons, half-wits. Suicidally so.

  • Quite Rightly 3:34 PM on 05/21/2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , political correctness,   

    What a Deal: A Ground Zero Mosque and Sharia Law in the U.S. 

    Who could resist a two-fer like that?

    Not surprisingly, the imam spearheading this mosque is a big supporter of Muslim law ruling American Christians, Jews, Buddhists, Hindus, and everybody else, and has written that the purpose of this mosque is to lay the groundwork to establish shariah law in the U.S.

    This link will take you to a petition to stop the building of the mega-mosque in the Ground Zero kill zone. I strongly encourage you to make your opposition known to Mayor Bloomberg, the Financial District Committee who approved this plan, and Community Board No. 1 who gave them authority to do so.

    You are asked to be polite in your communications by blogger Pamela Geller of Atlas Shrugs, co-founder of the human rights group, Stop Islamization of America (SIOA), which is hosting a rally at Ground Zero on June 6 at noon to protest the construction of this mosque.

    More at Bread upon the Waters.

     
  • Sherry 6:07 PM on 05/18/2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , political correctness,   

    Ha Ha! Now We Can Talk About… 

    This is what qualifies as intellectual heft. I don’t hear the right getting their undies in a wad about Kagan’s proclivities but have a “Devout” Catholic on the Court and even though he’s been there since Reagan, that’s something to talk about and you know it’s just scary.

    http://politicalwire.com/archives/2010/05/18/sex_lives_of_supreme_court_justices.html

    Asking is this normal for the Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia to have nine children? Mind you, he’s been on the court since 1986 but hey, it’s hilarious to point at the man who sits on the highest court and laugh at him and his wife for their personal witness of their faith.

    If you google Antonin Scalia, you’ll find chortles from the left over the examining of he and his wife having 9 children…because such a thing makes him unfathomable to those who wish to mock a justice for his faith and family to advance their own agendas. Nice tolerance folks. Way to make us see that gosh, we should all love you for all your open-mindedness and higher understanding of what’s what.

    Having 9 of my own, I can tell you, you are always hearing opening and closing arguments. You must sift through countless renditions of life to hear something of what actually happened and you have to trust your own judgement sufficiently to apply your values as you render a verdict.

    But giggle giggle giggle, “it’s not normal.” Reading the responses felt like hearing twittering adolescents on a party line.

    Seeing as there are only 9 in total at any time, the Supreme Court is not a Photoshop of America, it’s supposed to be the highest court with the finest minds; or doesn’t that teaching at the University of Chicago after graduating from Harvard Law Degree that he has count for something?

    Oh, I forgot, all academic weight is negated by the moniker Conservative and those 9 kids according to the Liberal Handbook for allowing people to hold positions of power.  Must remember to pick one of those manifestos up….

     
    • backyardconservative 7:28 PM on 05/18/2010 Permalink | Reply

      Who is more in touch? Scalia or MIchael Kinsley. Or Elena ivory tower Kagan for that matter.

      Is Kinsley trying to change the subject from those on his own side who want to “out” Kagan for political reasons. Whether she’s gay or not. Like Andrew Sullivan, who will, I’m sure, soon go back to attacking Sarah Palin’s Trig-hahaha how hilarious.

    • LarryD 8:25 PM on 05/18/2010 Permalink | Reply

      I’m not sure of the ages of his kids, but just wait until they’re all eligible to vote…and then when they start having kids….stupid liberals are aborting and contracepting themselves out of existence. And they want everyone else to do the same.

      • Jill 5:30 AM on 05/19/2010 Permalink | Reply

        Michael Kinsley is a contemptible weasel for inviting these kinds of comments.

        • Sherry 9:35 AM on 05/19/2010 Permalink | Reply

          That is what my problem is; it may have been Satire to illustrate the stupidity of discussing Kagan’s sexuality when what matters is her capacity as a judicial candidate but it subjected people (Scalia’s wife and children) to unnecessary and ugly scorn and vitriol as a means of proving what point exactly? I know. My ox gored too, but if you’re not going to get mad when your ox is gored, when exactly should you get upset?

  • backyardconservative 8:52 AM on 05/13/2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , political correctness   

    Former Hoops Star Palin Fights for Highland Park HS Girls 

    Sarah Palin took suburban Chicago Rosemont by storm in her speech last night and directly challenged the suburban Chicago Highland Park High School decision to ban their championship girls basketball team from playing at a tournament in Arizona. Palin: “Keeping the girl’s basketball team off the court for political reasons? Those are fighting words,”. Sun Times front page Palin: “Them’s fightin words”. The Tribune story calls Palin a conservative “firebrand”. Hmm, who’s afraid of strong women?

    More here.

     
    • rubyslipperblog 1:45 AM on 05/14/2010 Permalink | Reply

      I saw these girls on Fox a few times today. Good for Sarah Palin for standing up for them. This Arizona thing is so out of hand.

    • backyardconservative 10:35 AM on 05/14/2010 Permalink | Reply

      It’s interesting. Most everyone is on the side of the girls. So many on the left are so tone deaf–they never think things through. Title 9 girls vs. a remote possibility of “safety” concerns–it’s more dangerous on the south side of chicago.

  • backyardconservative 11:24 AM on 05/12/2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , political correctness   

    Another PC travesty? Will sports take a hit? 

    I have really been tired of boycotts for a long time having been an unwilling observer of Jesse Jackson’s shameless corporate shakedowns (which have been elevated to an art form by this Chicago Way White House–extending it to all the rest of us soon enough). Now it’s hitting sports over the Arizona immigration law flap. David Harsanyi takes this on:

    Sports happens to be one of the most meritocratic institutions in this nation. It divides us into regional and traditional clusters. To inject corrosive political grandstanding into this thing that so many of us love can only undermine the camaraderie of fans, who are able to put aside their ideological differences, financial situations and often their worries to partake in a communal gratification that politicians and “activists” only pretend to understand and foster.

    Sadly for some high school girls who love to play basketball, their school has cancelled a planned trip to Arizona. Even in this liberal suburb of Chicago there is pushback. Because not all games are political ones–and most people understand that. Must every facet of our lives be subordinated to political control?

    P.S. As the American flag incident illustrates, many of our schools no longer seek to teach but to indoctrinate.

     
    • rubyslipperblog 12:22 PM on 05/12/2010 Permalink | Reply

      How absurd, why do these schools continue to surrender to every PC message suggested by the left? No one is served by cancelling this basketball game, no one.

      • fuzislippers 2:27 PM on 05/12/2010 Permalink | Reply

        It’s (past) time for parents to start being heard. For far too long, we’ve sat back, not wanting “to make a fuss” and to be amicable about the PC stuff, but all that has gotten us is a more daring, more outrageous left who is never happy and never will be happy. Time to put our collective foot down and start being just as vocal, only politely so of course, in protecting our rights, values, beliefs, and culture as the left is, less politely, in running roughshod over them.

        • backyardconservative 3:23 PM on 05/12/2010 Permalink | Reply

          Yes. I was really amazed the parents spoke up–it’s a very liberal area. But then again, if you have to be PC about sports what’s the point. Maybe the school will give them participation plaques with little happy faces on them just for starting the season.

        • Quite Rightly 4:19 PM on 05/12/2010 Permalink | Reply

          I think the pushback really has started. Look at the outrage people are feeling as a result of the California flag tee-shirt fiasco. The school had to have a special meeting to field complaints from the community, which they had to move to a larger room to hold the crowd. Fox News is showing video, and the patriots are not ashamed to show that they are hot under the collar. It will take the school’s PC administrator/bullies a while, but I think that they will get the message if enough people make a fuss.

    • backyardconservative 5:07 PM on 05/12/2010 Permalink | Reply

      I think even if they weren’t participants, or agree on some of the issues with the Tea Parties, I think that example made more people feel empowered to speak up around the country.

      People are not satisfied with simple answers any more and a lot have high mistrust of their government, even at the local level.

      • Yukio Ngaby 11:56 PM on 05/12/2010 Permalink | Reply

        As they should. Local governments are some of the biggest abusers of authority ( I remember when a zoning comission arbitrarily decided to not allow a HAM radio operator to raise his attenna during the day), mainly because people don’t know or don’t care. This is unfortunate because local govts. are also the most responsive to public complaints due to their relatively small size.

    • backyardconservative 12:34 PM on 05/13/2010 Permalink | Reply

      Yes. They are most responsive. But sadly also they are often representatives of vested interests. Our local K-8 school board had a bus company owner, and education standards consultant, a special needs lawyer, a college professor and head of his union there (who negotiated with the teachers on our behalf) If not doing business with our board they did it with others–and vice verse. The bus owner did the PTA sponsored field trips and the high school.

      • Yukio Ngaby 7:21 PM on 05/13/2010 Permalink | Reply

        And this is different from the state or feds?

        I mean, aside from the scale and complexity of the conflict of interests and political back-rubbing.

    • backyardconservative 9:15 PM on 05/13/2010 Permalink | Reply

      If they personally know people locally it’s more intense–for good or bad

      • Yukio Ngaby 12:38 AM on 05/14/2010 Permalink | Reply

        I’m not sure I know what you mean.

        Who is the “they” and “people”? The “they” is govt. officials, correct? Is the “people” referring to the voters, or associates and friends involved in the conflicts of interest, or somebody else?

        I’m not trying to pick a fight here. Just trying to understand your point.

  • Quite Rightly 1:24 PM on 05/11/2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , political correctness   

    Supreme Court Unable to Save Memorial Cross from Desecration 

    Less than two weeks ago, on April 28th, five members of the Supreme Court decided to let an 8-foot war memorial cross stand in the middle of the Mojave Desert despite the objections of an Oregon man distressed by the possibility that he might someday drive through the Mojave Desert and, from the road, view that memorial cross, which had been erected in 1934 by members of the local post of the Veterans of Foreign Wars.

    Against the possibility that the eyes of someone driving through the Mojave Desert might momentarily rest on an object he considers offensive, the cross has been covered with plywood for the last 10 years as the ACLU worked to have it removed from a desert preserve owned by the U.S. government. Over the weekend, “vandals” took it upon themselves to finally remove the plywood covering from the cross. A few hours later, on Sunday, when workers were sent to replace the plywood covering, they found that the problem of having a memorial cross exposed to public view had been solved, not by plywood, but by “by thieves who cut the metal bolts that attached the symbol to a rock in the sprawling desert preserve.”

    Authorities are suggesting that the cross was removed by “scrap metal scavengers.”

    Uh huh.

    As reported by The Press-Enterprise of Riverside, California, the president of the Liberty Institute, one of the law firms representing the veteran caretakers of the Mojave desert cross, had this to say:

    This is an outrage, akin to desecrating people’s graves. It’s a disgraceful attack on the selfless sacrifice of our veterans. We will not rest until this memorial is re-installed.

    The VFW also promised that the memorial will be rebuilt:

    “This was a legal fight that a vandal just made personal to 50 million veterans, military personnel and their families,” National Commander Thomas J. Tradewell said.

    The cross had been sitting on land controlled by the National Park Service until a transfer of the section of land on which it stood could be transferred to the VFW in a land exchange ordered by Congress. That was a compromise that the plaintiff and the ACLU refused to accept. They adamantly fought to have the cross torn down before the land was transferred, which was the demand that brought the case to the Supreme Court. After hearing oral arguments, the court said:

    The goal of avoiding governmental endorsement does not require eradication of all religious symbols in the public realm. . . .

    Of course, some people will never quite understand the protections afforded to society when the majority of its members honor such simple rules of conduct as “Thou shalt not steal.”

    Cross posted at Bread upon the Waters.

     
  • backyardconservative 1:34 PM on 05/03/2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , political correctness,   

    San Francisco not a sanctuary for some 

    In The American Thinker, quoting the Chronicle:

    Hundreds of people marched into Tuesday’s Board of Supervisors meeting to express their fear, frustration and outrage. But so far the response has been disappointing, particularly from the San Francisco Police Department. It seems intent on downplaying the role of race and its impact in the community.

    (snip)City officials, including the Police Department, say these assaults are part of a larger crime picture where gangs of kids take advantage of a vulnerable group of small stature.

    Euphemisms and evasions, what else is new?

    This illustrates once more, the law needs to be enforced even-handedly.

    …and then of course we have actual violence taking place in some of these open border rallies, unlike the accusations leveled at tea partiers who are supposedly fomenting it.

    More. The Left Fuels a Backlash on Illegals – Ralph Peters, New York Post

     
    • Quite Rightly 10:37 PM on 05/03/2010 Permalink | Reply

      This kind of violence has been around for a long time. It’s not gangstas trapped in multi-generational welfare poverty acting out their resentment of the success of Asian immigrants who make the necessary sacrifices to move rapidly from poverty to the middle class. No. It’s “kids” taking advantage of “a vulnerable group of small stature.” It says so in the liberal manual.

    • backyardconservative 10:51 PM on 05/03/2010 Permalink | Reply

      Yes.

      It’s despicable. PC thugs.

      Hard work and study hard works.

      Work hard. Study hard. That’s the way.

      Every place. Every time.

      You would hope they would figure it out. But not if their role models enable failure, while gaming the system for their own success.

  • Jill 11:12 AM on 04/28/2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , political correctness, ,   

    Ah, the simple life 

    WaPo via Weekly Standard:

    “I’m enjoying the run when something catches my eye and it’s this coyote. I know he knows I’m there. He never looks at me, he is laser-locked on that dog,” [Gov. Rick] Perry said.

    “I holler and the coyote stopped. I holler again. By this time I had taken my weapon out and charged it. It is now staring dead at me. Either me or the dog are in imminent danger. I did the appropriate thing and sent it to where coyotes go,” he said.

    Perry said the laser-pointer helped make a quick, clean kill.

    “It was not in a lot of pain,” he said. “It pretty much went down at that particular juncture.”

    Texas state law allows people to shoot coyotes that are threatening livestock or domestic animals. The dog was unharmed, Perry said.

    Perry’s security detail was not required to file a report about the governor discharging a weapon, said Department of Public Safety spokeswoman Tela Mange.

    “People shoot coyotes all the time, snakes all the time,” Mange said. “We don’t write reports.”

    The governor left the coyote where it fell.

    “He became mulch,” Perry said.

    Don’t mess with Texas, where stultifying bureaucracies and political correctness have yet to dominate practical reality.

     
c
Compose new post
j
Next post/Next comment
k
Previous post/Previous comment
r
Reply
e
Edit
o
Show/Hide comments
t
Go to top
l
Go to login
h
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
Cancel